About this Blog

Deep Nature is dedicated to the idea that there are patterns in the biological world that science is yet to comprehend. To quote from The Deep Structure of Biology: Is Convergence Sufficiently Ubiquitous to Give a Directional Signal? (edited by Simon Conway Morris), “Science is adept at describing and predicting the world around us, but, oddly, this power seems to evaporate when we come to biology.” My premise is that life evolves following an intricate set of rules and laws which we have yet to acknowledge.  Many of us see the patterns, but we are trained to overlook them or dismiss them as random coincidence.  I believe “convergent evolution” is the norm. It is prevalent at micro and macro levels, from the face patterns of birds that live in certain habitats to large scale multi-species ecological systems. Evolution, thus, is not random, but is to a large extent predictable. The same features keep evolving in different contexts, among unrelated species, at different times and places.  There appears to be a “deeper pattern of biological organization”, whereby certain habitat niches seem to demand certain species. However, our understanding of the mechanisms and reasons behind these patterns remains limited.   As George McGhee asks, “Are there deeper laws to biological organization? I suspect that the modern discipline of evolutionary biology is in a similar position as the scientific discipline of chemistry before the discovery of the periodic table of elements.”

Having been a birder since age seven, many of my examples of convergent evolution will derive from the avian world, and they will involve considerable detail (e.g. belly color, posture, habits, etc.). I suspect most experienced birders can simply look at an illustration of a bird from some field guide of a far off land they have never been to and immediately make a pretty good guess about a bird’s preferred habitat and its behavior simply by looking at the shape and plumage of the bird. For example, a black songbird with red shoulders or a red breast is almost certainly a male who displays boldly and sings prominently from perches in marshy wetlands.  My aim here is to give voice to those hunches and explore the patterns we see.


The Hoary Redpoll, a finch of the high Arctic, is larger, paler, and with a smaller bill than its southern cousin, the Common Redpoll, thus simultaneously satisfying Bergmann’s, Gloger’s, and Allen’s rules.

There is Bergmann’s rule, that more northerly species are larger (e.g. Polar Bear v Grizzly Bear; Snowy Owl v Great-horned Owl; Hoary Redpoll v Common Redpoll). Gloger’s rule would add that they are also more pale in color. There is Allen’s rule, that animals in warmer areas have larger surface areas, especially appendages, than animals in cold areas (e.g. compare the ears of Kit and Arctic Foxes). I posit there are thousands of such rules, which evolution is largely bound to follow.  Many of them we have noticed but never named.  Likewise, many exist for no apparent practical reason, at least that we can discern, yet they happen repeatedly, and with great detail, such that dismissing them as coincidence is unsettling.  These rules transcend species and genus and kingdoms, with similar traits evolving convergently and independently of each other according to these unnamed rules. My goal is to illustrate them, shine a light on them, and encourage discussion about them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s